Sure war is bad and killing people is bad, but can we stop acting like it's a choice ? Unfortunately, wars will happen as long as humans exist and it's much better to be on the winning side. So yeah, there are a lot of people building dashboards for killing people and it's not necessarily bad. I would even argue that it's much better than a lot of people whose work is to make kids and adults addicted to screens.
By 'it', I assume you mean war? Sure, right after we stop acting like all weapons are only ever used defensively.
Also, I think it's worth pointing out that the particular weapons being discussed here (precision targeting capabilities) are probably a lot more likely to be useful to an aggressor than to a defender.
Why would precision targeting be more useful to an aggressor than to a defender? In the last few months Ukraine has been achieving significant results with long-range precision drone strikes targeting a few key production facilities in Russia's military supply chains. If you can knock out the one factory that is the primary bottleneck for manufacturing a key weapons system then that acts as a serious force multiplier.
Any non-defensive war is a choice. In otherwords every war the US has fought since the war for independence has been a choice (yes, this includes the WWs).
War will happen as long as ignorance exists. Ignorance may exist as long as humans exist, but let's not pretend that humans are not responsible for wars.
I take your general points. There is a saying "there is no right or wrong, but right is right and wrong is wrong."
Violence is the unnecessary use of force. It may occasionally be necessary to kill in self defense, but it is always a tragedy. Killing people is both bad and a choice. This is actually a harder reality to face than "people be violent".
So if you where living in Nazi Germany you still saying these words?
I know a nation need to be powerful to defend it self from evil but you don't have to be evil murdering millions of people because you don't like their faith.
I'm just stating the obvious - wars are inevitable and hence every nation is directing significant ressources to self defense (and quite a lot to offense too).
Related to the supposed inevitability of war AND nazi Germany, I recommend Nicholson Baker’s Human Smoke. It’s a good catalog of the choices, both economic and philosophical, on all sides, leading up to it (and contrasted with pacifists).
I think it's a lot more nuanced than this. Defense can be perceived as threatening and cause others to increase their defense, as per Balance of Threat theory and the security dilemma, creating a feedback loop (arms race) that leads to a lose-lose situation, primarily for the weak, but also eventually for the strong.
I am not advocating against defense spending as a category. I am saying it needs to be done skilfully and as a last resort, with the understanding that it is only coherent in a world without a unipolar security architecture, and is therefore hopefully temporary.
"wars will happen as long as humans exist" - I fundamentally disagree with this premise. I never once saw a child murder another, so why do we assume it's inevitable when people are grown? Why do we hold adults to lower standards than children.
These assumptions when they go unquestioned create the landscape for war to be accepted.
There are plenty of examples of children that aren't provided for, given the time or care required to prevent outcomes that we don't want.
That doesn't mean that we accept child murder, we do everything we can to prevent it from happening.
If a plane falls out of the sky, we do everything that we can do to ensure it never happens again.
If we don't look at war and understand it, we won't ever have the tools to prevent it.
he won't because all they do is project their bad childhood into a false sense of self sufficiency that is entirely based on tacticool clothes/cars while very well knowing his self sufficiency relies solely on not being part of some minority.
The way your high-powered mind leads you astray with compelling false gymnastics is impressive, but obviously satisfies its own projective emotional need. Turn your perception inward rather than finding the demons outside to make real progress?
There will always be single things that two groups feel they both entitled to, and both sides can't share it. Death is the only tool we were given to ensure a single side wins.
Perhaps OP meant that the military industrial complex will always ensure wars happen?
Incentives are there to make money from weaponry and defense contracts. Further incentives are there to take land or resources, or to simply destabilize competing nations. To stop all of this requires a pretty fundamental shift in a human machine that is still hardwired for survival.
Nope, I mean humans are like that. We always want more, we are jalous of what another one have, there are countless unsolvable issues involving race, religions, history.
Sooner or later those transform into wars, inevitably. If by some miracle you could get all nations to agree not to arm, that would work, but of course it's unrealistic. As soon as there is 1 that don't agree (or worse, agree but arm secretely) everybody needs to arm as well.
Sure war is bad and killing people is bad, but can we stop acting like it's a choice ? Unfortunately, wars will happen as long as humans exist and it's much better to be on the winning side. So yeah, there are a lot of people building dashboards for killing people and it's not necessarily bad. I would even argue that it's much better than a lot of people whose work is to make kids and adults addicted to screens.