The problem is with 0.05 criterion. In particle physics, the hypothesis tests are done two ways with the alternate hypothesis flipped to be the null hypothesis and it has a lower threshold of passing as in - we believe when theres very strong evidence else we dont.
Atleast thats my read from the Higgs boson paper - https://higgsml.lal.in2p3.fr/files/2014/04/documentation_v1....
That's certainly one problem -- many have argued that it's too easy to meet this evidentiary standard, which explains why so many weak, non-replicable psychology papers get published.
You comment comparing psychology to physics is apt -- the evidentiary standard in hard science fields is much higher.
