Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Allegedly also Coca-Cola, Drummond and even some local companies like Postobón have been involved with paramilitary groups and sponsored crimes against civilians - and haven't faced any consequences. But this is a good precedent.


Certain there are others. Naomi Klein wrote about Ford paying to have its own Argentine employees murdered during the junta in the 70s, apparently to prevent unionization.



> In the aftermath, Ford Motor Company attempted to control the narrative by destroying news photographs onsite

America's own micro Tianamen. Private sector, of course.


America's private sector is to its government as China's government is to its private sector.

If you know what I mean ...


What the hell kind of corporate exec goes "well, I guess I have to get them murdered, there's shareholder value to protect"?


Are you aware of the history of labor organizing in the states...? Not meant as an attack, I'm genuinely wondering. Strike breakers routinely killed people, destroyed property, cars would have sticks of dynamite chucked into them, and famously the coal miners blew up a fucking bridge.

I think people tend to think that modern politics is how all politics was done and... nah. Before we had more robust judicial, communication, and surveillance systems, if someone threatened your business and you were wealthy enough, having them killed and dumped in a bog was 100% on the fuckin table.


Even recent times aren't that great either. With eBay heavily implying they were going to murder a reviewer over bad reviews.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60073359/steiner-v-ebay...


> Are you aware of the history of labor organizing in the states...?

No, I'm not. It sounds like a very interesting read, though. I don't think those things tended to happen over here, beyond mafia-style illegal dealings.


Americans get taught a weird fictionalized version of their own history where political violence ended at the Civil War, conveniently overlooking anything that might be awkward to explain in the present day. Little things like General MacArthur opening fire on veterans https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonus_Army ; MOVE bombings; Tulsa massacre https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jun/12/tuls... ; the general high levels of violence in the civil rights era; lynching, and so on.

The Pinkerton detective agency has a long history of being the go-to contractors for corporate violence against labour organisers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinkerton_(detective_agency)


One of my favorite stories from the Civil Rights era is the fact that California created the template for modern gun control as a direct response to the Black Panthers policing the Police with open-carried guns (just like, standing there, armed, while police did their jobs in Black communities), and the white establishment at the time absolutely shit bricks at the notion of the negro having firepower and demanded it be regulated by none other than Governor Ronald Reagan.


This kind of corporate exec, for example:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40665489


The kind that rises to the top. Time to watch Michael Clayton again.


The typical kind. Killing strikers and unionists used to be a standard mode of American capitalism.

Luckily no American corporation would ever murder someone who threatened their financial interests, nowadays.


Everyone pays protection money in Colombia, every single commercial entity except in the most upscale places.


It's incredibly unjust that companies are punished for paying "protection money" (read: "pay us or we burn your property and employees to the ground.")


No it's not. They always have the option to leave.


Okay, you leave, and now your employees are dead (probably tortured to death on LiveLeak.)

Or you could pay the ransom, report it to the DOJ, and then leave, like Chiquita did.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: