> It would be more interesting if you explained why you think this.
I tried to. I have said there are things about the human experience which might not be present in text datasets. This is a problem with models understanding physics for example. I am sorry I am not enough of an expert to provide more detailed arguments, but rest assured my opinion on this matter is irrelevant to you beyond this chain of internet comments.
> Hence, just language is enough.
Language is enough to administer a turing test, but I am not sure that a large language model trained on a corpus of text can gather enough information to be 100% successful in a rigorous test.
I tried to. I have said there are things about the human experience which might not be present in text datasets. This is a problem with models understanding physics for example. I am sorry I am not enough of an expert to provide more detailed arguments, but rest assured my opinion on this matter is irrelevant to you beyond this chain of internet comments.
> Hence, just language is enough.
Language is enough to administer a turing test, but I am not sure that a large language model trained on a corpus of text can gather enough information to be 100% successful in a rigorous test.