Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
greenyoda
on Dec 14, 2011
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
HTTP Cats
That's not an Easter egg; it's a legitimate status code from RFC 2324 (April 1, 1998):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_418
nickloewen
on Dec 14, 2011
|
next
[–]
That doesn't make it not an easter egg, though. Most 'easter eggs' function perfectly for what they are, they're just also amusing and not entirely necessary.
pitiburi
on Dec 14, 2011
|
parent
|
next
[–]
You, sir, have just found the perfect nickname for my girlfriend.
pluies_public
on Dec 14, 2011
|
prev
[–]
Quite a few RFCs published on April 1st are to be considered with somewhat of a grain of salt, cf. RFC 1149 (
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1149.txt
)
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_418