Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Well, okay. I'm in Silicon Valley. That map lists Comcast, AT&T, and a small local player I've never heard of. Comcast: my current ISP. AT&T: didn't offer broadband service the last time I checked; this has apparently changed since then. (But the map says they offer 75Mbps, but AT&T says only 50Mbps.) They've had accusations of privacy issues (tracking their users via inserting cookies, selling their data for ads unless the user opts-out for a token fee, IIRC) so, not so enthusiastic there, and the last small player offers gigabit (wow!) for $400/mo (dealbreaker).

So, maybe it's a duopoly, but the privacy stuff breaks it for me. Though I'm sure someone's going to point out that Comcast likely isn't any better…

So, I'm highlighted at "3" but really the answer is charitably 2, maybe 1.

Also, you've linked to the map highlighted at 10/1; but my understanding is that the FTC definition of broadband is presently 25/3.



> and a small local player I've never heard of

That's part of your problem; there is a third competitor and you didn't even try to do business with them, because they weren't one of the famously screwy companies you've heard of.

I don't envy your big two choices there, but I guarantee it'd be worse with just Comcast or (shudders) just AT&T.

A family member has a small cottage where just under half of the building is on the other side of the county line. We can only get one fixed provider there, and it's satellite, but over the county line they have Comcast and a couple other terrestrial ISPs. the situation is hilarious.

> Also, you've linked to the map highlighted at 10/1; but my understanding is that the FTC definition of broadband is presently 25/3.

Sorry! I pulled up that search from a bookmark (10/1, excluding satellite), and didn't switch the bandwidth setting back to the default.


> I'm sure someone's going to point out that Comcast likely isn't any better…

Google search: comcast http injection.

Results from 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013 ... all of them seem "surprised" about Comcast modifying HTTP stream data...

Comcast even published an RFC for it: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6108

Comcast even goes so far as to claim that it's "more" secure: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6108#section-10




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: