Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> He built git out of necessity, not out of some desire to have free software.

History has proven that necessity is a much better incentive, and produces better products than ideology.



I don't know about that. Hg was built at the same time for the same reason but seems to have more ideology around it, and I would argue it's a superior product that just was unlucky enough to not have github built for it.


For people who seriously care about performance like me, git is by far the superior product.

I don't care much about the github website, because 99% of the time I use git from the command line.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: