I built a small project on Cloudflare and it just works. I've had only one issue where I ended up contacting support and they were very prompt in addressing it.
The most insane thing about this is that it is not illegal to manufacture firearms in the United States. Providing that you do not sell or distribute the firearm, it is entirely legal to manufacture a firearm in the USA for personal use only. Laws vary state by state, of course, and it may be different in the state of New York, but assuming that this federal law has not been overridden by some state law in New York, then this proposed regulation is 100% nonsensical.
So it's okay to 3D print a gun as long as you have a serial number? That seems to reinforce that 3D printing shouldn't be banned, especially by blanket technical means.
That is the essence of the weird gun laws. Take a Glock pistol as an example. The only part that has a serial number and is legally “the gun” is the thing you hold in your hand: the frame. It’s plastic and has the trigger and some parts to hold the magazine.
The rest of the stuff? You can buy and overnight ship it to yourself legally with almost no regulation (as of 2026 CA requires more gun-like treatment for those parts).
Yes but nobody is forcing you to keep the parts that have markings. Those are wholly interchangeable without any paperwork required. It’s pretty weird imo
theres a procedural problem with this, and its apparently why the feds dont require serial number on a PMF until FFL transfer is about to occur
when should you be required to serialize it?
if you serialize after it is worked to the point of being a firearm, then there is a period in time, however short, when the firearm is unserialized, thus illegal, thus serializing after creation could be obscuring a crime.
vs serializing before firearmhood, and you are now requireing a "hunk of metal"
to be serialized because of what it MAY become in the future.
and just when does a hunk of metal start becoming a firearm, the so called 80% threshold
This was a "scratching my own itch" project that I cooked up because I was tired of Claude et al cluttering up all of my stuff with random markdown files. Just a simple Obsidian plugin to serve an API that the CLI tool can use to interact with the Obsidian vault. I use a Claude Skill to get the model to create all of those random markdown files in my Obsidian vault, and read from them when it needs context for something. It's working really well for me so far!
Well of course it produced bad results... it was given a bad prompt. Imagine how things would have turned out if you had given the same instructions to a skilled but naive contractor who contractually couldn't say no and couldn't question you. Probably pretty similar.
Yeah I don't see the utility in doing this hundreds of times back to back. A few iterations can tell us some things about how Claude optimizes code, but an open ended prompt to endlessly "improve" the code sounds like a bad boss making huge demands. I don't blame the AI for adding BS down the line.
I don't think the question "will the AI add BS" was what drove this experiment. The very first thing the author references is re-feeding and degrading the same image 100 times, which similarly is not about improving the image.
This was more about seeing in what interesting ways the LLM will "fail", to get a little glimpse into how the black-box "thinks".
Judging from what my contacts say, I would not hold my breath. HCP is going to get smashed by bureaucracy and bigcorp bs just like all other IBM acquisitions. All you have to do to verify this is look at linkedin and track the departures of the the acquired staff.
That's not true, commercial and municipal drones operate above 400ft all the time. Non-commercial/civilian drones piloted by someone without an FAA Part 107 certification and a waiver cannot fly above 400ft. Also, you are allowed to fly 400ft -above- a vertical structure (like a tower) up to 1000ft tall to avoid exactly this type of collision as long as you are within 400ft horizontally of the structure.
EDIT: crud, I did not read your post carefully enough, sorry, you addressed this point exactly. My bad.
Am I reading the chart wrong, or does it show that the S&P500 ex-top 10 stocks increased by 20% over 3 years? That would be a historically average and very reasonable return.
Do you think that airplanes, helicopters, and balloons are also inherently a creepy, invasive technology as well? Because from the perspective of capturing imaging data from the air there is really no functional difference between those and UAS...
