If you are just looking to massage the numbers so there are more first homes vs second homes percentage-wise without creating new first homes, then taxing luxury second homes may work. It has great potential to change the numbers on a spreadsheet.

Decreasing the number of secondary homes for the wealthy _does not_ create more first homes people can realistically afford though.

“People who rely on AI are the ones who will be left behind.”

And that’s exactly what happened to those who started using an abacus, a calculator, or a computer.

Exactly! Documenting how others can contribute to your project, if you accept contributions, is the only way to go.

This guy fails to communicate properly how others can and should contribute to his project. I see this all the time where the standards of a project aren't properly documented so the reviewer/maintainer just wastes time reviewing the same thing thousands of times until they give up.

This is likely the best answer so far. It would be the same as if they had subcontracted some software factory where many junior devs produced and shipped low quality code that “works”.

The writer of the article confesses to using LLMs to improve their grammar. Writer is then upset Grammarly correctly attributes the recommendation he is getting to someone they know. A nothing burger essentially.

Yup, it's very broken at this time, that's if you manage to get a reliably connection or the session to even show up.

Ofcom should probably be added to the US Sanctioned list.

Sure, let's make free labor required (not a preference) for everybody

As if shaming people for using ChatGPT to write articles will have any meaningful effect. It's also quite fatiguing having to read the same complaint over and over when the solution is so simple yet many fail to grasp it.